FocusOn Neurology
  • Biozone
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Migraine Research Library
  • LGS & Dravet Syndrome
  • Tardive Dyskinesia
  • Myasthenia Gravis
  • Neurofibromatosis
  • hATTR-PN
  • MDA 2024
  • CIDP Awareness Month
  • Alzheimer's Awareness Month
  • Anticoagulation Reversal Knowledge & Learning Center
  • PNS 2024 Annual Meeting Highlights
  • Parkinson's Disease
  • Biozone
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Migraine Research Library
  • LGS & Dravet Syndrome
  • Tardive Dyskinesia
  • hATTR-PN
  • CIDP Awareness Month
  • Alzheimer's Awareness Month
  • Anticoagulation Reversal Knowledge & Learning Center
  • PNS 2024 Annual Meeting Highlights

Advanced Search

Advanced Search

  • Featured:
  • Myasthenia Gravis
  • Neurofibromatosis
  • MDA 2024
  • Parkinson's Disease

Test–Retest Reliability of Repetitive Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Myasthenia Gravis Patients and Healthy Control Subjects

March 2024

Share:
Back to Myasthenia Gravis Resource Center homepage

Read Full Article

Abstract

Purpose:

Repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (ROVEMP) are a novel diagnostic test to quantify neuromuscular transmission deficits in extraocular muscles in myasthenia gravis. We aimed to investigate the test–retest reliability of the ROVEMP and the effect of amplitude and age.

Methods:

We performed the ROVEMP test twice in 19 patients with myasthenia gravis (52.7 ± 19.8 years) and in 15 healthy control subjects (46.5 ± 16 years). The Bland–Altman level of agreement was determined. The relationship between test–retest reliability and signal quality, participant age and signal amplitude was studied.

Results:

Limits of agreement were from −179.9 to 139.3 in myasthenia gravis patients and from −56.9 to 89.5 in healthy control subjects. Difference between measurements correlated with signal amplitude (r = −0.50, P < 0.001). Combining the primary cohort with previously published data from 114 subjects, we found a significant negative correlation between age and reference amplitude (r = −0.163, P = 0.045).

Conclusions:

This study shows that in our hands, the test–retest reliability of the ROVEMP is not optimal. Measurements with higher reference amplitude had a better quality, higher reproducibility, and increased diagnostic yield. We caution against the use of ROVEMP measurements of lower amplitude in clinical practice. In addition, given the correlation between age and amplitude, age matching of healthy control subjects and patients is essential in future studies.

Share

Modal body text goes here.

FocusOn logo
  • Articles
  • Multimedia
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • About FocusOn
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer. All right reserved.

Your Privacy

To give you the best possible experience we use cookies and similar technologies. We use data collected through these technologies for various purposes, including to enhance website functionality, remember your preferences, show the most relevant content, and show the most useful ads. You can select your preferences by clicking the link. For more information, please review our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

|
|

Cookie Policy

Information about our use of cookies

Wolters Kluwer ("we" or "us") wants to inform you about the ways we process your personal information. In this Privacy & Cookie Notice we explain what personal information we collect, use and disclose.

Personal information means any data relating to an individual who can be identified, directly or indirectly, based on that information. This may include information such as names, contact details, (online) identification data, online identifiers, or other characteristics specific to that individual.

Read More