FocusOn Neurology
  • Biozone
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Migraine Research Library
  • LGS & Dravet Syndrome
  • Tardive Dyskinesia
  • Myasthenia Gravis
  • Neurofibromatosis
  • hATTR-PN
  • MDA 2024
  • CIDP Awareness Month
  • Alzheimer's Awareness Month
  • Anticoagulation Reversal Knowledge & Learning Center
  • PNS 2024 Annual Meeting Highlights
  • Parkinson's Disease
  • Biozone
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Migraine Research Library
  • LGS & Dravet Syndrome
  • Tardive Dyskinesia
  • hATTR-PN
  • CIDP Awareness Month
  • Alzheimer's Awareness Month
  • Anticoagulation Reversal Knowledge & Learning Center
  • PNS 2024 Annual Meeting Highlights

Advanced Search

Advanced Search

  • Featured:
  • Myasthenia Gravis
  • Neurofibromatosis
  • MDA 2024
  • Parkinson's Disease

Efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis: A real-life experience at a national reference center

December 2023

Share:
Back to Myasthenia Gravis Resource Center homepage

Read Full Article

Abstract

Background and purpose

Inhibition of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) for IgG is a promising new therapeutic strategy for antibody-mediated disorders. We report our real-life experience with efgartigimod (EFG) in 19 patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) along a clinical follow-up of 14 months.

Methods

EFG was administered according to the GENERATIVE protocol (consisting of a Fixed period of two treatment cycles [given 1 month apart] of four infusions at weekly intervals, followed by a Flexible period of re-cycling in case of worsening). Eight patients were positive for acetylcholine receptor antibody, four for muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibody, and two for lipoprotein-related protein 4 antibody, and five were classified as triple negative. Efficacy of EFG was assessed by the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living, Myasthenia Gravis Composite, and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scales.

Results

Fifty-three percent of patients needed three treatment cycles, 26% needed four, and 21% needed five along the 14-month clinical follow-up. Meaningful improvement was observed at the end of each cycle with the clinical scores adopted. EFG had a dramatic effect on disease course, as during the year before treatment eight of 19 patients (42%) were hospitalized, and 15 of 19 (79%) needed treatment with plasma exchange or immunoglobulins; three of 19 (16%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. During EFG, none of the patients was hospitalized and only one patient required plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulins. No major side effects or infusion-related reactions occurred.

Conclusions

We observed that EFG was safe and modified significantly the course of the disease along a 14-month follow-up. Our experience strengthens the role of FcRn inhibition as an effective new tool for long-term treatment of gMG.

Share

Modal body text goes here.

FocusOn logo
  • Articles
  • Multimedia
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • About FocusOn
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer. All right reserved.

Your Privacy

To give you the best possible experience we use cookies and similar technologies. We use data collected through these technologies for various purposes, including to enhance website functionality, remember your preferences, show the most relevant content, and show the most useful ads. You can select your preferences by clicking the link. For more information, please review our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

|
|

Cookie Policy

Information about our use of cookies

Wolters Kluwer ("we" or "us") wants to inform you about the ways we process your personal information. In this Privacy & Cookie Notice we explain what personal information we collect, use and disclose.

Personal information means any data relating to an individual who can be identified, directly or indirectly, based on that information. This may include information such as names, contact details, (online) identification data, online identifiers, or other characteristics specific to that individual.

Read More