FocusOn Neurology
  • Biozone
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Migraine Research Library
  • LGS & Dravet Syndrome
  • Tardive Dyskinesia
  • Myasthenia Gravis
  • Neurofibromatosis
  • hATTR-PN
  • MDA 2024
  • CIDP Awareness Month
  • Alzheimer's Awareness Month
  • Anticoagulation Reversal Knowledge & Learning Center
  • PNS 2024 Annual Meeting Highlights
  • Parkinson's Disease
  • Biozone
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Migraine Research Library
  • LGS & Dravet Syndrome
  • Tardive Dyskinesia
  • hATTR-PN
  • CIDP Awareness Month
  • Alzheimer's Awareness Month
  • Anticoagulation Reversal Knowledge & Learning Center
  • PNS 2024 Annual Meeting Highlights

Advanced Search

Advanced Search

  • Featured:
  • Myasthenia Gravis
  • Neurofibromatosis
  • MDA 2024
  • Parkinson's Disease

Exploring Factors That Prolong the Diagnosis of Myasthenia Gravis

March 2024

Share:
Back to Myasthenia Gravis Resource Center homepage

Read Full Article

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a condition with significant phenotypic variability, posing a diagnostic challenge to many clinicians worldwide. Prolonged diagnosis can lead to reduced remission rates and morbidity. This study aimed to identify factors leading to a longer time to diagnosis in MG that could be addressed in future to optimize diagnosis time.

Methods

One hundred and ten patients from 3 institutions in Melbourne, Australia, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Demographic and clinical data were collected for these patients over the first 5 years from diagnosis and at 10 years. Nonparametric statistical analysis was used to identify factors contributing to a longer diagnosis time.

Results

The median time for MG diagnosis was 102 (345) days. 90% of patients were diagnosed before 1 year. Female patients took longer than male patients to be diagnosed (p = 0.013). The time taken for first presentation after symptom onset contributed most to diagnosis time (median 17 [141] days), with female patients and not working as contributory factors. Neurology referral took longer if patients had diplopia (p = 0.022), respiratory (p = 0.026) symptoms, or saw an ophthalmologist first (p < 0.001). Outpatient management compared with inpatient was associated with a longer time to be seen by a neurologist from referral (p < 0.001), for the first diagnostic result to return (p = 0.001), and for the result to be reviewed (p < 0.001). Ocular MG had a median greater time to neurologist review than generalized MG (median 5 [25] days vs 1 [13] days, p = 0.035). Electrophysiology tests took longer for outpatients than inpatients (median 21 [35] days vs 2 [8] days, p < 0.001). Outpatients were also started on treatment later than inpatients (p < 0.001). There was no association of MG severity, ethnicity, age, medical and ocular comorbidities, and public or private health service on diagnosis time. There was also no impact of time to diagnosis on Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America outcomes, number of follow-ups or hospitalizations, or prevalence of treatments used. This study is limited by low patient numbers and its retrospective nature.

Discussion

This study identified several factors that can contribute to a prolonged diagnosis time of MG. Patient and clinician education about MG and outpatient diagnostic efficiency needs emphasis. Further studies are also needed to explore the delayed presentation time of women and nonworking patients in MG.

Share

Modal body text goes here.

FocusOn logo
  • Articles
  • Multimedia
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • About FocusOn
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer. All right reserved.

Your Privacy

To give you the best possible experience we use cookies and similar technologies. We use data collected through these technologies for various purposes, including to enhance website functionality, remember your preferences, show the most relevant content, and show the most useful ads. You can select your preferences by clicking the link. For more information, please review our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

|
|

Cookie Policy

Information about our use of cookies

Wolters Kluwer ("we" or "us") wants to inform you about the ways we process your personal information. In this Privacy & Cookie Notice we explain what personal information we collect, use and disclose.

Personal information means any data relating to an individual who can be identified, directly or indirectly, based on that information. This may include information such as names, contact details, (online) identification data, online identifiers, or other characteristics specific to that individual.

Read More