FocusOn Neurology
  • Biozone
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Migraine Research Library
  • LGS & Dravet Syndrome
  • Tardive Dyskinesia
  • Myasthenia Gravis
  • Neurofibromatosis
  • hATTR-PN
  • MDA 2024
  • CIDP Awareness Month
  • Alzheimer's Awareness Month
  • Anticoagulation Reversal Knowledge & Learning Center
  • PNS 2024 Annual Meeting Highlights
  • Parkinson's Disease
  • Biozone
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Migraine Research Library
  • LGS & Dravet Syndrome
  • Tardive Dyskinesia
  • hATTR-PN
  • CIDP Awareness Month
  • Alzheimer's Awareness Month
  • Anticoagulation Reversal Knowledge & Learning Center
  • PNS 2024 Annual Meeting Highlights

Advanced Search

Advanced Search

  • Featured:
  • Myasthenia Gravis
  • Neurofibromatosis
  • MDA 2024
  • Parkinson's Disease

The use of andexanet alfa vs. 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrates in the setting of life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage

April 2024

Back to Anticoagulation Reversal Knowledge & Learning Center

Read Full Article

Abstract

Objective 

Andexanet alfa is a targeted reversal agent for life threatening hemorrhage associated with direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), but there is uncertainty regarding the benefit when compared to 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for this indication. We investigated the clinical outcomes and cost associated with reversal of DOACs in the setting of life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

Methods 

A retrospective evaluation was conducted to evaluate patients with ICH in the setting of anticoagulation with DOAC from 9/1/2013 to 4/30/2020. Patients were included in the study if they received reversal with either andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC.

Results 

Eighty-nine patients were included in the study. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality between patients who received andexanet alfa or 4F-PCC (52% vs. 35%, P = 0.14). Radiographic stability of bleed was identified in 57% of patients receiving andexanet alfa vs. 58% of patients receiving 4F-PCC (P = 0.93). Median length of stay was not different between the andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC populations (7 days [IQR 6 – 12] vs. 6 days [IQR 3–12], P = 0.66). Median cost of reversal agent was higher in patients receiving andexanet alfa compared to 4F-PCC ($15 000 [IQR 15 000–$27 000] vs. $11 650 [IQR $8567–$14 149]).

Conclusion 

Among patients with life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage in the setting of DOAC therapy, no clinical differences were observed with respect to selection of reversal agent. Prothrombin complex concentrates remain a viable alternative to reversal of DOAC therapy though multicenter, randomized, prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the role of 4F-PCC in the reversal of DOAC therapy.

 

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer
FocusOn logo
  • Articles
  • Multimedia
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • About FocusOn
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2025 Wolters Kluwer. All right reserved.

Your Privacy

To give you the best possible experience we use cookies and similar technologies. We use data collected through these technologies for various purposes, including to enhance website functionality, remember your preferences, show the most relevant content, and show the most useful ads. You can select your preferences by clicking the link. For more information, please review our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

|
|

Cookie Policy

Information about our use of cookies

Wolters Kluwer ("we" or "us") wants to inform you about the ways we process your personal information. In this Privacy & Cookie Notice we explain what personal information we collect, use and disclose.

Personal information means any data relating to an individual who can be identified, directly or indirectly, based on that information. This may include information such as names, contact details, (online) identification data, online identifiers, or other characteristics specific to that individual.

Read More